Inchies for inchie advent calendar
Oct. 21st, 2024 12:26 amSo, this is for an advent calendar game thingy... You know how much I love those. XD We have 25 participants, everyone draws 24 inchies (yes, little 1x1 inch drawings) and sends them to our victim organizer, who then builds advent calendars for all of us... With one inchie from each other participant. YAY! (Holy crap, I'm so f*cking glad I don't have to pack those letters!) These are the 24 inchies I drew. The topics are varied because I looked at everyone's profiles to find something that a) they will like, and b) I can actually draw. (Occasionally, that was one small Venn diagram.)

My favorite is, of course, the bog landscape - out of principle. (Yes, someone asked for that. Can do... LOL) I was also surprised that someone requested minerals, because, hey. XD From a purely artistic standpoint, I'm especially happy how the dragonfly and the fern turned out.
I used Staedtler fineliners (different tip sizes), watercolors, Posca white acrylic pen and Sakura white gel pen on KREUL mixed media paper (which is one of the very few "mixed media" papers that actually work for wet media).I don't know why the scan is so blurry - maybe something in the scanner settings.

My favorite is, of course, the bog landscape - out of principle. (Yes, someone asked for that. Can do... LOL) I was also surprised that someone requested minerals, because, hey. XD From a purely artistic standpoint, I'm especially happy how the dragonfly and the fern turned out.
I used Staedtler fineliners (different tip sizes), watercolors, Posca white acrylic pen and Sakura white gel pen on KREUL mixed media paper (which is one of the very few "mixed media" papers that actually work for wet media).I don't know why the scan is so blurry - maybe something in the scanner settings.
Papercuts and storytelling
Mar. 29th, 2023 12:55 pmSo, since I talked about shadow theater yesterday, I thought I'd talk a bit about the underlying traditional craft, Scherenschnitt (papercut), today - especially about the performance aspects of it.
I think you've all seen silhouette art before. Pretty much everyone agrees that papercut art was originally invented by the Chinese (who also came up with paper in the first place), but you know how it is with good ideas: they spread. In northern Europe, this traditional craft focuses mainly on portraiture, fairy tales and folk tales - in fact, at least from the 18th to the 20th century, it was considered the most appropriate form of illustration for traditional tales in Germany. I'm not just interested in Scherenschnitt (the German word for papercut art in this style) as illustration, though - in fact, I consider it a cultural loss to reduce it to that. Making a Scherenschnitt is, and always has been, a performance. The process is usually much more interesting than the results.
The first time I encountered Scherenschnitt as a live performance was as a young child (I was 5 or 6, maybe) at a market stall. Someone was sitting there and doing Scherenschnitt portraits of people, and I guess my parents had a bit of spare money at the time, because they paid the artist to do a portrait of me. (It's still in a picture frame on their wall. This should tell you two things: this is a VeryTraditionalHousehold (TM), and proud parents are proud parents everywhere.) Unfortunately, I don't remember the artist at all, not even if that was a man or a woman (and I'd have to take the picture out of its frame to look at the signature, which is typically on the back because you don't write or draw on Scherenschnitt art), but I remember being fascinated by the process of this person picking up black paper and scissors and... a face - my face - just appearing. I guess I don't need to explain it's extremely difficult to do a recognizable papercut portrait of someone without a preliminary drawing? Anyway, that was magical. Interestingly, in the result, it's visible how fascinated I was: some of you (the ones on access, anyway) have seen photos of the very peculiar 'focused' facial expression Kiddo!Eller had while playing chess. The Scherenschnitt somehow managed to capture exactly that. Baby!Eller was watching carefully.
At that time, of course, I didn't make papercut art. I enjoyed papercraft all right, but... Well. I wasn't the kind of artistic prodigy who would have been able to produce anything like that as a child! First, I had to figure out that I really need to use scissors and knives with my right hand despite being left-handed when it comes to everything else, like writing or drawing. (Yes, I know special scissors for lefties exist. No, my parents bought me those - they don't believe all the superstition about lefties and didn't try to re-train me when they noticed I picked up pens with my left - but leftie scissors don't help. I'm simply not capable of cutting properly with my left hand. It's interesting that cutting and drawing seem to require completely different brain activity despite both resulting in a picture, but there you go.) Also, no one in my family practices the art. (And the only shadow play I was exposed to was Mom shaping rabbits and such with her hands - you know. I got to see 'normal' puppet theater from my grandfather and father but was never really into that...) My first papercut was an ATC I made in 2009:

This is very obviously beginner work. The not-very-clean edges are not only my fault; the unsuitable material (a plain index card!) contributed, but, well. I also did not have that much control yet. Still, I'm quite happy how it turned out - as a first attempt, it's fine. Could have been much worse.
In the following years, I practiced a bit, but I was only able to add more detail on that small format when I actually used 'the good stuff', that is, professional-level papercut paper. This exists for a reason: it's thin enough for fast and easy cutting, but doesn't tear. Much. (I have, of coursed, managed even that... My superpower: destroying paper.) The following are two very classical fantasy-themed ATCs I made in 2015, using both scissors and knives. (In case you were wondering: I don't use any expensive tools for this. My favorite scissors came from the Euro Shop, and I really love break-off cutter knives. The only not-super-cheap tool I own is a Japanese swivel scalpel I wouldn't want to miss.)


These are actually okay-ish: I notice all the ways in which I could have done that better, and I shudder, but I guess all artists do that. LOL (I have somewhat better technique these days, but I haven't made any Scherenschnitt ATCs lately. Should probably do that again at some point...) Anyway... These pictures, unfortunately, were made at home, so no one got to watch the process, which is a total waste if you ask me. I think I have mentioned how the making of this stuff is soooo much more interesting than just pictures? Also: traditionally, it's inextricably linked with storytelling.
A famous example of papercut performance art are the papercuts by Hans Christian Andersen who is (unjustly) mainly known as a writer these days, but who was a storyteller really - his performances involved telling stories while cutting paper pictures. (He started his career at a theater, actually was into singing and acting before he began to write, so it's safe to assume he was extremely good at entertaining an audience!) Of course, having really good stories helped. (I mean, how many films are there of the Little Mermaid alone? I believe they recently made a new one though I haven't watched it yet.) Only the written versions lasted until today, but... From a storyteller standpoint it's really obvious his stories were designed to be told - I'll spare you the structural analysis of Andersen's fairy tales and a discussion of storytelling techniques vs. short-story writing techniques, and the (deliberate) use of colloquial vs. 'literary' language, but Andersen's stuff firmly falls into the first category. Just believe me, I would pay a shit ton of money for an opportunity to watch one of Andersen's performances... (Wrong century, alas.)
Later, as soon as film began to be a thing, silhouette animation also became a thing, especially in Germany - I simply have to mention Lotte Reiniger here, who pioneered that art form (and created the first feature-length animated film, before Walt Disney did, but got a lot less public credit due to being, well, female), but since this is getting long-ish again, I guess I'll save an in-depth discussion for another post. I will note, though, that her famous 1922 version of Cinderella (and, nope, absolutely not a coincidence she did fairy tales, too - people come with cultural backgrounds!) not only involves animated silhouette figures, but also animated silhouette hands cutting silhouette figures. She simulated the effect of hands appearing on a shadow theater screen nicely (and used it for effect!), which means she was absolutely aware of (and likely also personally experienced with) the cutting process itself as a performance technique in storytelling.
I think you've all seen silhouette art before. Pretty much everyone agrees that papercut art was originally invented by the Chinese (who also came up with paper in the first place), but you know how it is with good ideas: they spread. In northern Europe, this traditional craft focuses mainly on portraiture, fairy tales and folk tales - in fact, at least from the 18th to the 20th century, it was considered the most appropriate form of illustration for traditional tales in Germany. I'm not just interested in Scherenschnitt (the German word for papercut art in this style) as illustration, though - in fact, I consider it a cultural loss to reduce it to that. Making a Scherenschnitt is, and always has been, a performance. The process is usually much more interesting than the results.
The first time I encountered Scherenschnitt as a live performance was as a young child (I was 5 or 6, maybe) at a market stall. Someone was sitting there and doing Scherenschnitt portraits of people, and I guess my parents had a bit of spare money at the time, because they paid the artist to do a portrait of me. (It's still in a picture frame on their wall. This should tell you two things: this is a VeryTraditionalHousehold (TM), and proud parents are proud parents everywhere.) Unfortunately, I don't remember the artist at all, not even if that was a man or a woman (and I'd have to take the picture out of its frame to look at the signature, which is typically on the back because you don't write or draw on Scherenschnitt art), but I remember being fascinated by the process of this person picking up black paper and scissors and... a face - my face - just appearing. I guess I don't need to explain it's extremely difficult to do a recognizable papercut portrait of someone without a preliminary drawing? Anyway, that was magical. Interestingly, in the result, it's visible how fascinated I was: some of you (the ones on access, anyway) have seen photos of the very peculiar 'focused' facial expression Kiddo!Eller had while playing chess. The Scherenschnitt somehow managed to capture exactly that. Baby!Eller was watching carefully.
At that time, of course, I didn't make papercut art. I enjoyed papercraft all right, but... Well. I wasn't the kind of artistic prodigy who would have been able to produce anything like that as a child! First, I had to figure out that I really need to use scissors and knives with my right hand despite being left-handed when it comes to everything else, like writing or drawing. (Yes, I know special scissors for lefties exist. No, my parents bought me those - they don't believe all the superstition about lefties and didn't try to re-train me when they noticed I picked up pens with my left - but leftie scissors don't help. I'm simply not capable of cutting properly with my left hand. It's interesting that cutting and drawing seem to require completely different brain activity despite both resulting in a picture, but there you go.) Also, no one in my family practices the art. (And the only shadow play I was exposed to was Mom shaping rabbits and such with her hands - you know. I got to see 'normal' puppet theater from my grandfather and father but was never really into that...) My first papercut was an ATC I made in 2009:

This is very obviously beginner work. The not-very-clean edges are not only my fault; the unsuitable material (a plain index card!) contributed, but, well. I also did not have that much control yet. Still, I'm quite happy how it turned out - as a first attempt, it's fine. Could have been much worse.
In the following years, I practiced a bit, but I was only able to add more detail on that small format when I actually used 'the good stuff', that is, professional-level papercut paper. This exists for a reason: it's thin enough for fast and easy cutting, but doesn't tear. Much. (I have, of coursed, managed even that... My superpower: destroying paper.) The following are two very classical fantasy-themed ATCs I made in 2015, using both scissors and knives. (In case you were wondering: I don't use any expensive tools for this. My favorite scissors came from the Euro Shop, and I really love break-off cutter knives. The only not-super-cheap tool I own is a Japanese swivel scalpel I wouldn't want to miss.)


These are actually okay-ish: I notice all the ways in which I could have done that better, and I shudder, but I guess all artists do that. LOL (I have somewhat better technique these days, but I haven't made any Scherenschnitt ATCs lately. Should probably do that again at some point...) Anyway... These pictures, unfortunately, were made at home, so no one got to watch the process, which is a total waste if you ask me. I think I have mentioned how the making of this stuff is soooo much more interesting than just pictures? Also: traditionally, it's inextricably linked with storytelling.
A famous example of papercut performance art are the papercuts by Hans Christian Andersen who is (unjustly) mainly known as a writer these days, but who was a storyteller really - his performances involved telling stories while cutting paper pictures. (He started his career at a theater, actually was into singing and acting before he began to write, so it's safe to assume he was extremely good at entertaining an audience!) Of course, having really good stories helped. (I mean, how many films are there of the Little Mermaid alone? I believe they recently made a new one though I haven't watched it yet.) Only the written versions lasted until today, but... From a storyteller standpoint it's really obvious his stories were designed to be told - I'll spare you the structural analysis of Andersen's fairy tales and a discussion of storytelling techniques vs. short-story writing techniques, and the (deliberate) use of colloquial vs. 'literary' language, but Andersen's stuff firmly falls into the first category. Just believe me, I would pay a shit ton of money for an opportunity to watch one of Andersen's performances... (Wrong century, alas.)
Later, as soon as film began to be a thing, silhouette animation also became a thing, especially in Germany - I simply have to mention Lotte Reiniger here, who pioneered that art form (and created the first feature-length animated film, before Walt Disney did, but got a lot less public credit due to being, well, female), but since this is getting long-ish again, I guess I'll save an in-depth discussion for another post. I will note, though, that her famous 1922 version of Cinderella (and, nope, absolutely not a coincidence she did fairy tales, too - people come with cultural backgrounds!) not only involves animated silhouette figures, but also animated silhouette hands cutting silhouette figures. She simulated the effect of hands appearing on a shadow theater screen nicely (and used it for effect!), which means she was absolutely aware of (and likely also personally experienced with) the cutting process itself as a performance technique in storytelling.
My friend, the fish :)
Apr. 3rd, 2022 02:55 amToday, I have a step-by-step for you, so you can laugh at admire my messy loose coloration style! :)
It's for the "Random Material" ATC swap, where participants received an art box with randomand, let's face it, pretty crappy art supplies and had to do something with the stuff they received. This is not supposed to be an advertisement for the material I used here: it's - literally - randomly chosen stuff that's neither exceptionally great nor matching nor anything, really. Which, of course, is the challenge of this game!

When I don't know what to draw, mermaids are one of my default themes. Very fast fineliner drawing.

First layer of the coloration was done with alcohol-based markers:
Twinmarker BG1 Blue Grey
Winsor&Newton promarker brush in Almond
Ohuhu YR10 Brun
Ohuhu PB10 Turquoise Green Light
Ohuhu YR34 Yellow
I apologize to anyone who actually likes markers. This is bad and I know it. Okay, partially it's the fault of the paper - you're not supposed to use these markers on watercolor paper - but also, it's painfully obvious that I simply can't use markers. I can't even tell whether the brands I received are good or bad. They're wasted on me either way.

The next layer is with watercolor:
Arts Arch Brilliant Yellow
Arts Arch Vermilion
Apolo Arte Violeta Intenso
Daler Rowney Aquafine Transparent Turquoise
Jaxon Brilliant Green
Fortunately, at least with the watercolors, I know what I'm doing! XD This is starting to look like a perfectly normal intermediate coloration stage.
Also, I have Opinions on the colors that were in my art box. The Daler Rowney paint is great, and it's a PB16 (!), which is a pretty rare pigment and very lightfast, so that's one I'm super happy with. The Apolo Arte is a PV23, which is one of my standard pigments anyway, and the manufacturer, as far as I can tell, didn't do anything wrong with it: it's strongly pigmented and I'll definitely keep using it. Yay! The Jaxon Brilliant Green is a PG7, and wow, this is the first time I have to consider a PG7 a crushing failure: it's so weakly pigmented it's basically just greenish slime. And PG7 isn't even an expensive pigment, so, there's no excuse! The Arts Arch colors are questionable because they don't have any pigment information. Also, the yellow handles okayish, but the red is CRAP. I assume this is the super-cheap stuff. Whatever...

I also had some colored pencils in my box and tried them out!
Then a few crayons came into play:
Castle Arts Pasteltint Juniper Lime
Castle Arts Soft Touch Flesh
Stabilo aquacolor in a dark blue
Cretacolor AquaGraph White
I rarely work with pencils, so, no detail work here. Just some unification of the color areas. :) Also, I'm no expert, but these pencils are fine as far as I can tell. I especially liked the Castle Arts pencils which gave off a very rich, smooth color layer. The white AquaGraph was a bit of a disappointment, though: virtually invisible, just a barely noticeable lightening of the color below.

Then cameFlySea Acrylic Markers in white, black, yellow, red, and light green.
Unfortunately, they also don't come with pigment or lightfastness information, so I'll have to conduct my own tests - but I have to say, I'm very happy with how these markers handle. The colors are very opaque and the hard plastic tip is wonderful for detail work.

And, of course, I added some white sparkle. Every picture needs some sparkle! XD
The sparkle didn't end up as dots but rather... strings?!?... because the paint is somewhat slimy. It's super weird. Anyway, I tried to use this as an effect, so I paid attention to the direction in which the strings were going. I suppose if you want that kind of directionality, this paint is actually quite useful, but, let's face it: it's not very good white paint.
And this is a proper scan of the finished ATC. :)
It's for the "Random Material" ATC swap, where participants received an art box with random

When I don't know what to draw, mermaids are one of my default themes. Very fast fineliner drawing.

First layer of the coloration was done with alcohol-based markers:
Twinmarker BG1 Blue Grey
Winsor&Newton promarker brush in Almond
Ohuhu YR10 Brun
Ohuhu PB10 Turquoise Green Light
Ohuhu YR34 Yellow
I apologize to anyone who actually likes markers. This is bad and I know it. Okay, partially it's the fault of the paper - you're not supposed to use these markers on watercolor paper - but also, it's painfully obvious that I simply can't use markers. I can't even tell whether the brands I received are good or bad. They're wasted on me either way.

The next layer is with watercolor:
Arts Arch Brilliant Yellow
Arts Arch Vermilion
Apolo Arte Violeta Intenso
Daler Rowney Aquafine Transparent Turquoise
Jaxon Brilliant Green
Fortunately, at least with the watercolors, I know what I'm doing! XD This is starting to look like a perfectly normal intermediate coloration stage.
Also, I have Opinions on the colors that were in my art box. The Daler Rowney paint is great, and it's a PB16 (!), which is a pretty rare pigment and very lightfast, so that's one I'm super happy with. The Apolo Arte is a PV23, which is one of my standard pigments anyway, and the manufacturer, as far as I can tell, didn't do anything wrong with it: it's strongly pigmented and I'll definitely keep using it. Yay! The Jaxon Brilliant Green is a PG7, and wow, this is the first time I have to consider a PG7 a crushing failure: it's so weakly pigmented it's basically just greenish slime. And PG7 isn't even an expensive pigment, so, there's no excuse! The Arts Arch colors are questionable because they don't have any pigment information. Also, the yellow handles okayish, but the red is CRAP. I assume this is the super-cheap stuff. Whatever...

I also had some colored pencils in my box and tried them out!
Then a few crayons came into play:
Castle Arts Pasteltint Juniper Lime
Castle Arts Soft Touch Flesh
Stabilo aquacolor in a dark blue
Cretacolor AquaGraph White
I rarely work with pencils, so, no detail work here. Just some unification of the color areas. :) Also, I'm no expert, but these pencils are fine as far as I can tell. I especially liked the Castle Arts pencils which gave off a very rich, smooth color layer. The white AquaGraph was a bit of a disappointment, though: virtually invisible, just a barely noticeable lightening of the color below.

Then cameFlySea Acrylic Markers in white, black, yellow, red, and light green.
Unfortunately, they also don't come with pigment or lightfastness information, so I'll have to conduct my own tests - but I have to say, I'm very happy with how these markers handle. The colors are very opaque and the hard plastic tip is wonderful for detail work.

And, of course, I added some white sparkle. Every picture needs some sparkle! XD
The sparkle didn't end up as dots but rather... strings?!?... because the paint is somewhat slimy. It's super weird. Anyway, I tried to use this as an effect, so I paid attention to the direction in which the strings were going. I suppose if you want that kind of directionality, this paint is actually quite useful, but, let's face it: it's not very good white paint.

And this is a proper scan of the finished ATC. :)