<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>

<rss version='2.0' xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/1.0/' xmlns:atom10='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<channel>
  <title>eller</title>
  <link>https://eller.dreamwidth.org/</link>
  <description>eller - Dreamwidth Studios</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 02:48:35 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>LiveJournal / Dreamwidth Studios</generator>
  <lj:journal>eller</lj:journal>
  <lj:journaltype>personal</lj:journaltype>
  

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://eller.dreamwidth.org/192573.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 02:48:35 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Computational fun :D</title>
  <link>https://eller.dreamwidth.org/192573.html</link>
  <description>For a really good joke, I have a strong &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.sigbovik.org/2024/proceedings.pdf&quot;&gt;reading recommendation&lt;/a&gt; for my fellow computing freaks as well as anyone even remotely into math. (Starting page 199, &apos;Quantum Disavantage&apos;) It&apos;s a lovely response to the guys at IBM (&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06096-3&quot;&gt;Kim et al., 2023&lt;/a&gt;) who did a quantum computing thingy that got quite a lot of media attention. They also claimed it was impossible to do this stuff on a &apos;regular&apos; computer, which was refuted &lt;em&gt;within days&lt;/em&gt; and caused a few shitstorms (not least because it&apos;s &lt;em&gt;rude&lt;/em&gt; to publish this kind of claim in Nature without releasing a preprint on arXiv first... Manners, manners!) in the modeller scene. Now, someone... took this as an opportunity to bring out the good old Commodore 64 for entertainment. I love it. It&apos;s totally worth it for the photo of the &apos;experimental setup&apos; alone, but really, the whole thing is quite funny. (Of course, anything published by &lt;a href=&quot;https://sigbovik.org/&quot;&gt;The Association for Computational Heresy&lt;/a&gt; usually is.)&amp;nbsp; :D&amp;nbsp;:D&amp;nbsp;:D&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also found in the same volume (page 398 ff) is a really lovely Toki Pona paper (&apos;Toki Pona and Orders of Semantic Completeness&apos;) - everybody&apos;s favorite language, right?!?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=eller&amp;ditemid=192573&quot; width=&quot;30&quot; height=&quot;12&quot; alt=&quot;comment count unavailable&quot; style=&quot;vertical-align: middle;&quot;/&gt; comments</description>
  <comments>https://eller.dreamwidth.org/192573.html</comments>
  <category>science</category>
  <category>language</category>
  <category>mathematics</category>
  <category>computer modelling</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>0</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://eller.dreamwidth.org/39555.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2019 20:38:20 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Divination algorithm &amp;lt;3</title>
  <link>https://eller.dreamwidth.org/39555.html</link>
  <description>So, this is basically... a math-y reading recommendation? Prompted by something mostly unrelated in a Discord chat that reminded me of all the ways divination and computer modelling can interconnect. (And not just in the way I use runes and tarot cards for math-y brainstorming; that&apos;s not divination at all.) Anyway. One of my favorite publications in recent years is this one:&lt;br /&gt;https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7387702&lt;br /&gt;It&apos;s called &amp;quot;I-Ching Divination Evolutionary Algorithm and its Convergence Analysis&amp;quot; and it&apos;s a perfectly serious paper, and one that I want to cite in my own work very badly; I just can&apos;t find a justification (yet) for doing so. (The topic is close enough to what I work on, just this type of algorithm I&apos;ve never implemented, nor will I do so in the foreseeable future. Too bad.) The authors developed their lovely algorithm based on the traditional Chinese divination system of I-Ching which I unfortunately don&apos;t know enough about to make any intelligent comments... Just: this is not only creative and fun, but actually &lt;em&gt;good&lt;/em&gt; (from the algorithmic side of things).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=eller&amp;ditemid=39555&quot; width=&quot;30&quot; height=&quot;12&quot; alt=&quot;comment count unavailable&quot; style=&quot;vertical-align: middle;&quot;/&gt; comments</description>
  <comments>https://eller.dreamwidth.org/39555.html</comments>
  <category>algorithms</category>
  <category>science</category>
  <category>divination</category>
  <category>computer modelling</category>
  <category>magic</category>
  <category>mathematics</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>0</lj:reply-count>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
