<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dw="https://www.dreamwidth.org">
  <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2018-09-19:3427238</id>
  <title>eller</title>
  <subtitle>eller</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>eller</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://eller.dreamwidth.org/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://eller.dreamwidth.org/data/atom"/>
  <updated>2024-04-19T02:53:33Z</updated>
  <dw:journal username="eller" type="personal"/>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2018-09-19:3427238:192573</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://eller.dreamwidth.org/192573.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://eller.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=192573"/>
    <title>Computational fun :D</title>
    <published>2024-04-19T02:48:35Z</published>
    <updated>2024-04-19T02:53:33Z</updated>
    <category term="computer modelling"/>
    <category term="language"/>
    <category term="science"/>
    <category term="mathematics"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">For a really good joke, I have a strong &lt;a href="https://www.sigbovik.org/2024/proceedings.pdf"&gt;reading recommendation&lt;/a&gt; for my fellow computing freaks as well as anyone even remotely into math. (Starting page 199, 'Quantum Disavantage') It's a lovely response to the guys at IBM (&lt;a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06096-3"&gt;Kim et al., 2023&lt;/a&gt;) who did a quantum computing thingy that got quite a lot of media attention. They also claimed it was impossible to do this stuff on a 'regular' computer, which was refuted &lt;em&gt;within days&lt;/em&gt; and caused a few shitstorms (not least because it's &lt;em&gt;rude&lt;/em&gt; to publish this kind of claim in Nature without releasing a preprint on arXiv first... Manners, manners!) in the modeller scene. Now, someone... took this as an opportunity to bring out the good old Commodore 64 for entertainment. I love it. It's totally worth it for the photo of the 'experimental setup' alone, but really, the whole thing is quite funny. (Of course, anything published by &lt;a href="https://sigbovik.org/"&gt;The Association for Computational Heresy&lt;/a&gt; usually is.)&amp;nbsp; :D&amp;nbsp;:D&amp;nbsp;:D&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also found in the same volume (page 398 ff) is a really lovely Toki Pona paper ('Toki Pona and Orders of Semantic Completeness') - everybody's favorite language, right?!?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=eller&amp;ditemid=192573" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2018-09-19:3427238:39555</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://eller.dreamwidth.org/39555.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://eller.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=39555"/>
    <title>Divination algorithm &amp;lt;3</title>
    <published>2019-12-01T20:38:20Z</published>
    <updated>2019-12-01T20:38:20Z</updated>
    <category term="algorithms"/>
    <category term="computer modelling"/>
    <category term="science"/>
    <category term="mathematics"/>
    <category term="divination"/>
    <category term="magic"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">So, this is basically... a math-y reading recommendation? Prompted by something mostly unrelated in a Discord chat that reminded me of all the ways divination and computer modelling can interconnect. (And not just in the way I use runes and tarot cards for math-y brainstorming; that's not divination at all.) Anyway. One of my favorite publications in recent years is this one:&lt;br /&gt;https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7387702&lt;br /&gt;It's called &amp;quot;I-Ching Divination Evolutionary Algorithm and its Convergence Analysis&amp;quot; and it's a perfectly serious paper, and one that I want to cite in my own work very badly; I just can't find a justification (yet) for doing so. (The topic is close enough to what I work on, just this type of algorithm I've never implemented, nor will I do so in the foreseeable future. Too bad.) The authors developed their lovely algorithm based on the traditional Chinese divination system of I-Ching which I unfortunately don't know enough about to make any intelligent comments... Just: this is not only creative and fun, but actually &lt;em&gt;good&lt;/em&gt; (from the algorithmic side of things).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=eller&amp;ditemid=39555" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
